LMND vs SPY: Correlation
Lemonade, Inc. (LMND) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.35.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are LMND and SPY?
Over the past 3 years, LMND and SPY moved with a correlation of 0.35, which is moderate. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.28) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.43, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 420.0 %².
Out of 11 assets tracked against LMND, SPY lands near the bottom at #7. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months SPY outperformed by 20.7 percentage points (-0.1% for LMND against +20.6% for SPY). Risk is not evenly split, since LMND carries 5.8 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
LMND vs SPY: side by side
| LMND (Lemonade, Inc.) | SPY (SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -0.1% | +20.6% |
| 5-year return | -28.5% | +82.4% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 84.2% | 14.5% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 2.01 | 1.00 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -51.5% | -18.8% |
| Market cap | $4.2B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.01% |
| Expense ratio | – | 0.09% |
| Assets under management | – | $795.3B |
| Sector / category | US Listed | ETF · US Large Cap |
SPY is a Large Blend fund from State Street Investment Management: $795.3B under management, 504 holdings, a 0.09% expense ratio, a 1.01% trailing dividend yield.
Year-by-year returns
| Year | LMND | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -67.5% | -18.2% |
| 2023 | +17.9% | +26.2% |
| 2024 | +127.4% | +24.9% |
| 2025 | +94.1% | +17.7% |
| 2026 | -24.2% | +13.7% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are LMND and SPY good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.35, LMND and SPY keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between LMND and SPY?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between LMND and SPY is 0.35 over 3 years, 0.28 over 1 year and 0.43 over 5 years.
Is SPY a good diversifier for LMND?
Reasonably. At 0.35, LMND and SPY keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.35 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.35 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lmnd-vs-spy.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lmnd-vs-spy/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: LMND correlations · SPY correlations
