PairBook
HomeLMND › LMND vs VXZ

LMND vs VXZ: Correlation

How closely do Lemonade, Inc. (LMND) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.35, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.35
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.22
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.37
long-run
Ann. covariance
-758.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LMND and VXZ?

On 3 years of weekly data the LMND/VXZ correlation comes out at -0.35, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (-0.22) than the 3-year average (-0.35). The 5-year figure is -0.37, and annualized covariance runs at -758.9 %².

VXZ is close to the least connected end of LMND's tracked universe, ranking #11 of 11. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with LMND ahead by 16.0 points (-0.1% versus -16.1%). Risk is not evenly split, since LMND carries 3.3 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LMND vs VXZ: side by side

LMND (Lemonade, Inc.)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return-0.1%-16.1%
5-year return-28.5%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)84.2%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5002.01-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-51.5%-36.4%
Market cap$4.2B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -51.5%Higher 5y return: LMND -28.5% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+86%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. LMND · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearLMNDVXZ
2022-67.5%+0.5%
2023+17.9%-44.0%
2024+127.4%-12.7%
2025+94.1%+5.7%
2026-24.2%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LMND and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.35, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LMND and VXZ?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between LMND and VXZ is -0.35 over 3 years, -0.22 over 1 year and -0.37 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for LMND?

Yes: at -0.35, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.35 mean?

A reading of -0.35 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lmnd-vs-vxz.json

LMND vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.35LMND vs VXZ-0.35

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![LMND vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lmnd-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lmnd-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LMND correlations · VXZ correlations