PairBook
HomeLITE › LITE vs XLK

LITE vs XLK: Correlation

Lumentum (LITE) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.45.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.45
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.13
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.45
long-run
Ann. covariance
708.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LITE and XLK?

Over the past 3 years, LITE and XLK moved with a correlation of 0.45, which is moderate. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at 0.13 versus 0.45 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.45, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 708.0 %².

By 3-year correlation, XLK places #21 of the 34 assets tracked against LITE. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with LITE ahead by 616.4 points (+659.8% versus +43.4%). This link changes with the market regime, having swung between -0.04 and 0.77 on a rolling one-year basis. Risk is not evenly split, since LITE carries 2.7 times the volatility of the other side.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
How the one-year correlation itself moved over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LITE vs XLK: side by side

LITE (Lumentum)XLK (Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund)
1-year return+659.8%+43.4%
5-year return+998.1%+145.2%
Volatility (ann.)65.5%24.0%
Beta vs S&P 5002.361.50
Max drawdown (3Y)-50.6%-25.7%
Market cap$85.8B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.45%
Expense ratio0.08%
Assets under management$115.4B
Sector / categoryInformation TechnologySector ETF
Higher yield: XLK 0.45% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: XLK -25.7% vs -50.6%Higher 5y return: LITE +998.1% vs +145.2%

On the fund side, XLK sits in the Technology category at State Street Investment Management, with $115.4B under management, 73 holdings, a 0.08% expense ratio, a 0.45% trailing dividend yield.

-1%0%+550%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). LITE · XLK

Year-by-year returns

YearLITEXLK
2022-50.7%-27.7%
2023+0.5%+56.0%
2024+60.1%+21.6%
2025+339.1%+24.6%
2026+159.4%+31.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Fund exposure

Keep in mind that XLK holds LITE at a 0.49% weight, which makes a slice of this correlation mechanical rather than coincidental.

Are LITE and XLK good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.45 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LITE and XLK?

The LITE/XLK correlation stands at 0.45 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.13, 5 years: 0.45), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is XLK a good diversifier for LITE?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.45 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.45 mean?

A reading of 0.45 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lite-vs-xlk.json

LITE vs XLK: 3-year weekly correlation 0.45LITE vs XLK0.45

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![LITE vs XLK correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lite-vs-xlk.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lite-vs-xlk/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LITE correlations · XLK correlations