PairBook
HomeLITE › LITE vs TRI

LITE vs TRI: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Lumentum (LITE) and Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) carry a correlation of -0.23, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.23
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.50
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.15
long-run
Ann. covariance
-477.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LITE and TRI?

Over the past 3 years, LITE and TRI moved with a correlation of -0.23, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.50) than the 3-year average (-0.23). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.15, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -477.5 %².

TRI is close to the least connected end of LITE's tracked universe, ranking #31 of 34. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with LITE ahead by 697.4 points (+659.8% versus -37.6%). Note the risk asymmetry: LITE runs 2.0 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LITE vs TRI: side by side

LITE (Lumentum)TRI (Thomson Reuters Corp)
1-year return+659.8%-37.6%
5-year return+998.1%-0.4%
Volatility (ann.)65.5%32.0%
Beta vs S&P 5002.360.53
Max drawdown (3Y)-50.6%-62.9%
Market cap$85.8B$45.4B
P/E (trailing)27.6
Dividend yield0.00%2.48%
Sector / categoryInformation TechnologyUS Listed
Higher yield: TRI 2.48% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: LITE -50.6% vs -62.9%Higher 5y return: LITE +998.1% vs -0.4%
-53%0%+550%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. LITE · TRI

Year-by-year returns

YearLITETRI
2022-50.7%-3.0%
2023+0.5%+30.0%
2024+60.1%+11.1%
2025+339.1%-16.6%
2026+159.4%-17.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LITE and TRI good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.23, LITE and TRI have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LITE and TRI?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.23 over 3 years, with -0.50 over the last year and -0.15 over 5 years.

Is TRI a good diversifier for LITE?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.23, LITE and TRI have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lite-vs-tri.json

LITE vs TRI: 3-year weekly correlation -0.23LITE vs TRI-0.23

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![LITE vs TRI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lite-vs-tri.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lite-vs-tri/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LITE correlations · TRI correlations