PairBook
HomeLITE › LITE vs MATH

LITE vs MATH: Correlation

How closely do Lumentum (LITE) and Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.19, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.34
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.13
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1116.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LITE and MATH?

On 3 years of weekly data the LITE/MATH correlation comes out at -0.19, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.34 versus -0.19 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is -0.13, and annualized covariance runs at -1116.5 %².

By 3-year correlation, MATH places #29 of the 34 assets tracked against LITE. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months LITE outperformed by 730.5 percentage points (+659.8% for LITE against -70.7% for MATH).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LITE vs MATH: side by side

LITE (Lumentum)MATH (Metalpha Technology Holding Limited)
1-year return+659.8%-70.7%
5-year return+998.1%-40.4%
Volatility (ann.)65.5%90.1%
Beta vs S&P 5002.360.53
Max drawdown (3Y)-50.6%-81.9%
Market cap$85.8B
P/E (trailing)41.7
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryInformation TechnologyUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: LITE -50.6% vs -81.9%Higher 5y return: LITE +998.1% vs -40.4%
-76%0%+550%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. LITE · MATH

Year-by-year returns

YearLITEMATH
2022-50.7%-57.4%
2023+0.5%+323.3%
2024+60.1%-47.2%
2025+339.1%+82.6%
2026+159.4%-60.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LITE and MATH good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LITE and MATH?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.19 over 3 years, with -0.34 over the last year and -0.13 over 5 years.

Is MATH a good diversifier for LITE?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lite-vs-math.json

LITE vs MATH: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19LITE vs MATH-0.19

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![LITE vs MATH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lite-vs-math.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lite-vs-math/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LITE correlations · MATH correlations