PairBook
HomeLIND › LIND vs VXZ

LIND vs VXZ: Correlation

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings Inc. (LIND) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.40.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.40
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.35
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.44
long-run
Ann. covariance
-696.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LIND and VXZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of LIND and VXZ correlate at -0.40, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.35 over 1 year against -0.40 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.44, with an annualized covariance of -696.8 %².

Out of 11 assets tracked against LIND, VXZ lands near the bottom at #10. The last year tells two different stories: LIND led by 116.5 percentage points, +100.4% for LIND against -16.1% for VXZ. One caveat on sizing: LIND is 2.6 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LIND vs VXZ: side by side

LIND (Lindblad Expeditions Holdings Inc.)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+100.4%-16.1%
5-year return+102.2%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)67.7%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.97-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-43.8%-36.4%
Market cap$2.0B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -43.8%Higher 5y return: LIND +102.2% vs -53.1%
-20%0%+132%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. LIND · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearLINDVXZ
2022-50.6%+0.5%
2023+46.4%-44.0%
2024+5.2%-12.7%
2025+21.6%+5.7%
2026+108.5%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LIND and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.40, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LIND and VXZ?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.40 over 3 years, with -0.35 over the last year and -0.44 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for LIND?

Yes: at -0.40, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.40 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lind-vs-vxz.json

LIND vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.40LIND vs VXZ-0.40

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![LIND vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lind-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lind-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LIND correlations · VXZ correlations