PairBook
HomeLIND › LIND vs UMBF

LIND vs UMBF: Correlation

How closely do Lindblad Expeditions Holdings Inc. (LIND) and UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.64, which is strong.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.64
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.60
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.49
long-run
Ann. covariance
1221.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LIND and UMBF?

On 3 years of weekly data the LIND/UMBF correlation comes out at 0.64, strong. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.60 over 1 year against 0.64 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.49, and annualized covariance runs at 1221.5 %².

In LIND's tracked universe of 11 assets, UMBF sits right near the top at #2. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months LIND outperformed by 81.2 percentage points (+100.4% for LIND against +19.2% for UMBF). Note the risk asymmetry: LIND runs 2.4 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LIND vs UMBF: side by side

LIND (Lindblad Expeditions Holdings Inc.)UMBF (UMB Financial Corporation)
1-year return+100.4%+19.2%
5-year return+102.2%+73.4%
Volatility (ann.)67.7%28.4%
Beta vs S&P 5001.971.01
Max drawdown (3Y)-43.8%-31.8%
Market cap$2.0B$11.0B
P/E (trailing)11.9
Dividend yield0.00%1.18%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: UMBF 1.18% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: UMBF -31.8% vs -43.8%Higher 5y return: LIND +102.2% vs +73.4%
-20%0%+132%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. LIND · UMBF

Year-by-year returns

YearLINDUMBF
2022-50.6%-20.0%
2023+46.4%+2.2%
2024+5.2%+37.3%
2025+21.6%+3.4%
2026+108.5%+26.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LIND and UMBF good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.64 means LIND and UMBF share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LIND and UMBF?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.64 over 3 years, with 0.60 over the last year and 0.49 over 5 years.

Is UMBF a good diversifier for LIND?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.64 means LIND and UMBF share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.64 mean?

A reading of 0.64 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lind-vs-umbf.json

LIND vs UMBF: 3-year weekly correlation 0.64LIND vs UMBF0.64

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![LIND vs UMBF correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lind-vs-umbf.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lind-vs-umbf/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LIND correlations · UMBF correlations