PairBook
HomeLIF › LIF vs ULTA

LIF vs ULTA: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Life360, Inc. (LIF) and Ulta Beauty (ULTA) carry a correlation of 0.39, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.39
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.42
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
924.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LIF and ULTA?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of LIF and ULTA correlate at 0.39, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.42 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of 924.2 %².

By 3-year correlation, ULTA places #13 of the 20 assets tracked against LIF. The last year tells two different stories: ULTA led by 52.6 percentage points, -51.4% for LIF against +1.2% for ULTA. Risk is not evenly split, since LIF carries 1.8 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LIF vs ULTA: side by side

LIF (Life360, Inc.)ULTA (Ulta Beauty)
1-year return-51.4%+1.2%
5-year returnn/a+41.0%
Volatility (ann.)63.6%35.3%
Beta vs S&P 5002.180.75
Max drawdown (3Y)-65.6%-44.6%
Market cap$3.6B$23.2B
P/E (trailing)25.120.4
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Discretionary
Lower P/E: ULTA 20.4 vs 25.1Smaller drawdown: ULTA -44.6% vs -65.6%
-59%0%+34%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. LIF · ULTA

Year-by-year returns

YearLIFULTA
2022+13.8%
2023+4.5%
2024-11.2%
2025+55.4%+39.1%
2026-31.0%-10.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LIF and ULTA good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.39 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LIF and ULTA?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.39 over 3 years, with 0.42 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is ULTA a good diversifier for LIF?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.39 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.39 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lif-vs-ulta.json

LIF vs ULTA: 3-year weekly correlation 0.39LIF vs ULTA0.39

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![LIF vs ULTA correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lif-vs-ulta.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lif-vs-ulta/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LIF correlations · ULTA correlations