BN vs LIF: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Brookfield Corporation Class A Limited Voting Shares (BN) and Life360, Inc. (LIF) carry a correlation of 0.50, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BN and LIF?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BN and LIF correlate at 0.50, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.47 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of 888.8 %².
Within BN's tracked universe of 32 assets, LIF comes in at #21 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months BN outperformed by 46.9 percentage points (-4.5% for BN against -51.4% for LIF). Risk is not evenly split, since LIF carries 2.2 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BN vs LIF: side by side
| BN (Brookfield Corporation Class A Limited Voting Shares) | LIF (Life360, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -4.5% | -51.4% |
| 5-year return | +42.1% | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 28.8% | 63.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.47 | 2.18 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -27.8% | -65.6% |
| Market cap | $92.5B | $3.6B |
| P/E (trailing) | 76.7 | 25.1 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BN | LIF |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -34.6% | – |
| 2023 | +28.6% | – |
| 2024 | +44.2% | – |
| 2025 | +20.5% | +55.4% |
| 2026 | -9.4% | -31.0% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BN and LIF good diversifiers for each other?
To a limited degree. At 0.50 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BN and LIF?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.50 over 3 years, with 0.47 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.
Is LIF a good diversifier for BN?
To a limited degree. At 0.50 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.
What does a correlation of 0.50 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.50 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bn-vs-lif.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bn-vs-lif/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BN correlations · LIF correlations
