PairBook
HomeLFMD › LFMD vs VXZ

LFMD vs VXZ: Correlation

LifeMD, Inc. (LFMD) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.21.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.21
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.07
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.31
long-run
Ann. covariance
-456.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LFMD and VXZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of LFMD and VXZ correlate at -0.21, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.07 versus -0.21 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.31, with an annualized covariance of -456.5 %².

Among the 15 assets we track against LFMD, VXZ sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #13. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with VXZ ahead by 33.0 points (-49.1% versus -16.1%). Note the risk asymmetry: LFMD runs 3.3 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LFMD vs VXZ: side by side

LFMD (LifeMD, Inc.)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return-49.1%-16.1%
5-year return-58.8%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)84.5%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.35-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-82.5%-36.4%
Market cap$0.2B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -82.5%Higher 5y return: VXZ -53.1% vs -58.8%
-56%0%+15%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. LFMD · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearLFMDVXZ
2022-49.9%+0.5%
2023+327.3%-44.0%
2024-40.3%-12.7%
2025-31.1%+5.7%
2026-4.4%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LFMD and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.21, LFMD and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LFMD and VXZ?

The LFMD/VXZ correlation stands at -0.21 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.07, 5 years: -0.31), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for LFMD?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.21, LFMD and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lfmd-vs-vxz.json

LFMD vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.21LFMD vs VXZ-0.21

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![LFMD vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lfmd-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lfmd-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LFMD correlations · VXZ correlations