CDLX vs LFMD: Correlation
Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX) and LifeMD, Inc. (LFMD) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.43.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CDLX and LFMD?
On 3 years of weekly data the CDLX/LFMD correlation comes out at 0.43, moderate. The past 12 months show a weaker link (0.20) than the 3-year average (0.43). The 5-year figure is 0.36, and annualized covariance runs at 4857.3 %².
Within CDLX's tracked universe of 15 assets, LFMD comes in at #4 by 3-year correlation. The trailing year gives LFMD the advantage: -61.1% versus -49.1%, a 12.0-point spread. Note the risk asymmetry: CDLX runs 1.6 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CDLX vs LFMD: side by side
| CDLX (Cardlytics, Inc.) | LFMD (LifeMD, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -61.1% | -49.1% |
| 5-year return | -99.6% | -58.8% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 134.2% | 84.5% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 2.27 | 1.35 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -98.3% | -82.5% |
| Market cap | – | $0.2B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CDLX | LFMD |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -91.3% | -49.9% |
| 2023 | +59.3% | +327.3% |
| 2024 | -59.7% | -40.3% |
| 2025 | -69.0% | -31.1% |
| 2026 | -65.1% | -4.4% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CDLX and LFMD good diversifiers for each other?
A fair diversifier. At 0.43, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CDLX and LFMD?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CDLX and LFMD is 0.43 over 3 years, 0.20 over 1 year and 0.36 over 5 years.
Is LFMD a good diversifier for CDLX?
A fair diversifier. At 0.43, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
What does a correlation of 0.43 mean?
A reading of 0.43 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cdlx-vs-lfmd.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cdlx-vs-lfmd/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CDLX correlations · LFMD correlations
