PairBook
HomeLCTX › LCTX vs STRO

LCTX vs STRO: Correlation

How closely do Lineage Cell Therapeutics, Inc. (LCTX) and Sutro Biopharma, Inc. (STRO) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.37, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.37
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.27
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.36
long-run
Ann. covariance
2985.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LCTX and STRO?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of LCTX and STRO correlate at 0.37, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.27 over 1 year against 0.37 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.36, with an annualized covariance of 2985.9 %².

Few assets follow LCTX as closely as STRO, which ranks #2 of 11 tracked partners. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months STRO outperformed by 141.7 percentage points (-4.9% for LCTX against +136.8% for STRO). Risk is not evenly split, since STRO carries 1.6 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LCTX vs STRO: side by side

LCTX (Lineage Cell Therapeutics, Inc.)STRO (Sutro Biopharma, Inc.)
1-year return-4.9%+136.8%
5-year return-52.7%-90.2%
Volatility (ann.)72.1%112.5%
Beta vs S&P 5001.003.52
Max drawdown (3Y)-73.6%-90.8%
Market cap$0.3B$0.4B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: LCTX -73.6% vs -90.8%Higher 5y return: LCTX -52.7% vs -90.2%
-24%0%+280%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). LCTX · STRO

Year-by-year returns

YearLCTXSTRO
2022-52.2%-45.7%
2023-6.8%-46.9%
2024-54.1%-57.1%
2025+234.0%-37.1%
2026-30.5%+84.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LCTX and STRO good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.37, LCTX and STRO keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LCTX and STRO?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.37 over 3 years, with 0.27 over the last year and 0.36 over 5 years.

Is STRO a good diversifier for LCTX?

Reasonably. At 0.37, LCTX and STRO keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.37 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lctx-vs-stro.json

LCTX vs STRO: 3-year weekly correlation 0.37LCTX vs STRO0.37

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![LCTX vs STRO correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lctx-vs-stro.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lctx-vs-stro/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LCTX correlations · STRO correlations