PairBook
HomeKURA › KURA vs LCTX

KURA vs LCTX: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Kura Oncology, Inc. (KURA) and Lineage Cell Therapeutics, Inc. (LCTX) carry a correlation of 0.36, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.36
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.33
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.35
long-run
Ann. covariance
1554.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are KURA and LCTX?

Over the past 3 years, KURA and LCTX moved with a correlation of 0.36, which is moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.33 over 1 year against 0.36 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.35, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 1554.7 %².

Among the 20 assets we track against KURA, LCTX ranks #12 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months KURA outperformed by 72.6 percentage points (+67.7% for KURA against -4.9% for LCTX).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

KURA vs LCTX: side by side

KURA (Kura Oncology, Inc.)LCTX (Lineage Cell Therapeutics, Inc.)
1-year return+67.7%-4.9%
5-year return-30.6%-52.7%
Volatility (ann.)59.8%72.1%
Beta vs S&P 5001.611.00
Max drawdown (3Y)-76.5%-73.6%
Market cap$1.2B$0.3B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: LCTX -73.6% vs -76.5%Higher 5y return: KURA -30.6% vs -52.7%
-16%0%+60%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). KURA · LCTX

Year-by-year returns

YearKURALCTX
2022-11.4%-52.2%
2023+15.9%-6.8%
2024-39.4%-54.1%
2025+19.3%+234.0%
2026+26.9%-30.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are KURA and LCTX good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.36, KURA and LCTX keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between KURA and LCTX?

The KURA/LCTX correlation stands at 0.36 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.33, 5 years: 0.35), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is LCTX a good diversifier for KURA?

Reasonably. At 0.36, KURA and LCTX keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.36 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/kura-vs-lctx.json

KURA vs LCTX: 3-year weekly correlation 0.36KURA vs LCTX0.36

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![KURA vs LCTX correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/kura-vs-lctx.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/kura-vs-lctx/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: KURA correlations · LCTX correlations