PairBook
HomeLANV › LANV vs WSM

LANV vs WSM: Correlation

Lanvin Group Holdings Limited (LANV) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.15.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.15
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.03
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.15
long-run
Ann. covariance
-435.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LANV and WSM?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of LANV and WSM correlate at -0.15, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.03 versus -0.15 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.15, with an annualized covariance of -435.6 %².

Among the 52 assets we track against LANV, WSM ranks #14 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with WSM ahead by 76.3 points (-50.5% versus +25.8%). One caveat on sizing: LANV is 1.6 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LANV vs WSM: side by side

LANV (Lanvin Group Holdings Limited)WSM (Williams-Sonoma, Inc.)
1-year return-50.5%+25.8%
5-year return-89.7%+182.0%
Volatility (ann.)69.7%43.0%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.151.33
Max drawdown (3Y)-78.6%-36.8%
Market cap$0.1B$28.1B
P/E (trailing)24.4
Dividend yield0.00%0.56%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Discretionary
Higher yield: WSM 0.56% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: WSM -36.8% vs -78.6%Higher 5y return: WSM +182.0% vs -89.7%
-57%0%+26%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. LANV · WSM

Year-by-year returns

YearLANVWSM
2022-6.1%-30.5%
2023-67.7%+80.2%
2024-31.9%+86.6%
2025+0.0%-2.1%
2026-50.2%+34.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LANV and WSM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.15, LANV and WSM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LANV and WSM?

The LANV/WSM correlation stands at -0.15 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.03, 5 years: -0.15), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is WSM a good diversifier for LANV?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.15, LANV and WSM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.15 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lanv-vs-wsm.json

LANV vs WSM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.15LANV vs WSM-0.15

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![LANV vs WSM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lanv-vs-wsm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lanv-vs-wsm/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LANV correlations · WSM correlations