LANV vs TV: Correlation
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited (LANV) and Grupo Televisa S.A.B. (TV) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.17.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are LANV and TV?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of LANV and TV correlate at -0.17, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.06) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.17). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.14, with an annualized covariance of -621.2 %².
Among the 52 assets we track against LANV, TV ranks #21 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months TV outperformed by 52.7 percentage points (-50.5% for LANV against +2.2% for TV).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
LANV vs TV: side by side
| LANV (Lanvin Group Holdings Limited) | TV (Grupo Televisa S.A.B.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -50.5% | +2.2% |
| 5-year return | -89.7% | -72.6% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 69.7% | 52.4% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -0.15 | 0.69 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -78.6% | -59.2% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | $1.4B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | LANV | TV |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -6.1% | -50.9% |
| 2023 | -67.7% | -25.2% |
| 2024 | -31.9% | -40.6% |
| 2025 | +0.0% | +81.5% |
| 2026 | -50.2% | -5.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are LANV and TV good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.17, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between LANV and TV?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between LANV and TV is -0.17 over 3 years, 0.06 over 1 year and -0.14 over 5 years.
Is TV a good diversifier for LANV?
Yes: at -0.17, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.17 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.17 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lanv-vs-tv.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lanv-vs-tv/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: LANV correlations · TV correlations
