PairBook
HomeLANV › LANV vs TFC

LANV vs TFC: Correlation

How closely do Lanvin Group Holdings Limited (LANV) and Truist Financial (TFC) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.16, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.16
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.20
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.12
long-run
Ann. covariance
-312.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LANV and TFC?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of LANV and TFC correlate at -0.16, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.20) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.12, with an annualized covariance of -312.0 %².

Among the 52 assets we track against LANV, TFC ranks #17 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months TFC outperformed by 62.6 percentage points (-50.5% for LANV against +12.1% for TFC). Risk is not evenly split, since LANV carries 2.5 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LANV vs TFC: side by side

LANV (Lanvin Group Holdings Limited)TFC (Truist Financial)
1-year return-50.5%+12.1%
5-year return-89.7%+12.7%
Volatility (ann.)69.7%28.0%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.151.07
Max drawdown (3Y)-78.6%-26.9%
Market cap$0.1B$61.4B
P/E (trailing)11.6
Dividend yield0.00%4.10%
Sector / categoryUS ListedFinancials
Higher yield: TFC 4.10% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: TFC -26.9% vs -78.6%Higher 5y return: TFC +12.7% vs -89.7%
-57%0%+21%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. LANV · TFC

Year-by-year returns

YearLANVTFC
2022-6.1%-23.5%
2023-67.7%-8.6%
2024-31.9%+23.7%
2025+0.0%+19.0%
2026-50.2%+5.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LANV and TFC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.16, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LANV and TFC?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.16 over 3 years, with -0.20 over the last year and -0.12 over 5 years.

Is TFC a good diversifier for LANV?

Yes: at -0.16, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.16 mean?

A reading of -0.16 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lanv-vs-tfc.json

LANV vs TFC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.16LANV vs TFC-0.16

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![LANV vs TFC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lanv-vs-tfc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lanv-vs-tfc/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LANV correlations · TFC correlations