LANV vs RUSHA: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Lanvin Group Holdings Limited (LANV) and Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA) carry a correlation of -0.21, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are LANV and RUSHA?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of LANV and RUSHA correlate at -0.21, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.24 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.12, with an annualized covariance of -453.7 %².
Within LANV's tracked universe of 52 assets, RUSHA comes in at #33 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: RUSHA led by 82.3 percentage points, -50.5% for LANV against +31.8% for RUSHA. Note the risk asymmetry: LANV runs 2.2 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
LANV vs RUSHA: side by side
| LANV (Lanvin Group Holdings Limited) | RUSHA (Rush Enterprises, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -50.5% | +31.8% |
| 5-year return | -89.7% | +177.5% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 69.7% | 31.3% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -0.15 | 0.93 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -78.6% | -26.8% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | $8.3B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 23.2 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.99% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | LANV | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -6.1% | -4.5% |
| 2023 | -67.7% | +46.7% |
| 2024 | -31.9% | +10.4% |
| 2025 | +0.0% | -0.2% |
| 2026 | -50.2% | +42.8% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are LANV and RUSHA good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.21, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between LANV and RUSHA?
The LANV/RUSHA correlation stands at -0.21 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.24, 5 years: -0.12), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is RUSHA a good diversifier for LANV?
Yes: at -0.21, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?
A reading of -0.21 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lanv-vs-rusha.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lanv-vs-rusha/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: LANV correlations · RUSHA correlations
