LANV vs RF: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Lanvin Group Holdings Limited (LANV) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF) carry a correlation of -0.15, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are LANV and RF?
Over the past 3 years, LANV and RF moved with a correlation of -0.15, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.24 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.10, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -299.1 %².
Within LANV's tracked universe of 52 assets, RF comes in at #13 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: RF led by 65.9 percentage points, -50.5% for LANV against +15.4% for RF. Risk is not evenly split, since LANV carries 2.4 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
LANV vs RF: side by side
| LANV (Lanvin Group Holdings Limited) | RF (Regions Financial Corporation) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -50.5% | +15.4% |
| 5-year return | -89.7% | +83.5% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 69.7% | 29.2% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -0.15 | 1.09 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -78.6% | -31.9% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | $25.9B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 12.4 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 3.45% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Financials |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | LANV | RF |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -6.1% | +2.3% |
| 2023 | -67.7% | -5.7% |
| 2024 | -31.9% | +27.0% |
| 2025 | +0.0% | +20.2% |
| 2026 | -50.2% | +14.3% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are LANV and RF good diversifiers for each other?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.15, LANV and RF have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
FAQ
What is the correlation between LANV and RF?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between LANV and RF is -0.15 over 3 years, -0.24 over 1 year and -0.10 over 5 years.
Is RF a good diversifier for LANV?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.15, LANV and RF have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
What does a correlation of -0.15 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.15 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lanv-vs-rf.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lanv-vs-rf/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: LANV correlations · RF correlations
