PairBook
HomeLANV › LANV vs PH

LANV vs PH: Correlation

Lanvin Group Holdings Limited (LANV) and Parker Hannifin (PH) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.19.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.03
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.14
long-run
Ann. covariance
-349.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LANV and PH?

On 3 years of weekly data the LANV/PH correlation comes out at -0.19, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.03) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.19). The 5-year figure is -0.14, and annualized covariance runs at -349.9 %².

Within LANV's tracked universe of 52 assets, PH comes in at #26 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months PH outperformed by 83.3 percentage points (-50.5% for LANV against +32.8% for PH). Risk is not evenly split, since LANV carries 2.6 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LANV vs PH: side by side

LANV (Lanvin Group Holdings Limited)PH (Parker Hannifin)
1-year return-50.5%+32.8%
5-year return-89.7%+256.4%
Volatility (ann.)69.7%26.6%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.151.16
Max drawdown (3Y)-78.6%-26.8%
Market cap$0.1B$127.5B
P/E (trailing)36.5
Dividend yield0.00%0.71%
Sector / categoryUS ListedIndustrials
Higher yield: PH 0.71% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: PH -26.8% vs -78.6%Higher 5y return: PH +256.4% vs -89.7%
-57%0%+42%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. LANV · PH

Year-by-year returns

YearLANVPH
2022-6.1%-6.9%
2023-67.7%+60.8%
2024-31.9%+39.6%
2025+0.0%+39.5%
2026-50.2%+15.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LANV and PH good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.19, LANV and PH have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LANV and PH?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.19 over 3 years, with -0.03 over the last year and -0.14 over 5 years.

Is PH a good diversifier for LANV?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.19, LANV and PH have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

A reading of -0.19 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lanv-vs-ph.json

LANV vs PH: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19LANV vs PH-0.19

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![LANV vs PH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lanv-vs-ph.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lanv-vs-ph/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LANV correlations · PH correlations