LAKE vs LIF: Correlation
Lakeland Industries, Inc. (LAKE) and Life360, Inc. (LIF) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.38.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are LAKE and LIF?
Over the past 3 years, LAKE and LIF moved with a correlation of 0.38, which is moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.41 over 1 year against 0.38 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 1414.5 %².
Within LAKE's tracked universe of 12 assets, LIF comes in at #5 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: LAKE led by 28.9 percentage points, -22.5% for LAKE against -51.4% for LIF.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
LAKE vs LIF: side by side
| LAKE (Lakeland Industries, Inc.) | LIF (Life360, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -22.5% | -51.4% |
| 5-year return | -49.3% | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 55.0% | 63.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.32 | 2.18 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -71.2% | -65.6% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | $3.6B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 25.1 |
| Dividend yield | 0.76% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | LAKE | LIF |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -38.7% | – |
| 2023 | +40.6% | – |
| 2024 | +38.7% | – |
| 2025 | -65.2% | +55.4% |
| 2026 | +35.2% | -31.0% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are LAKE and LIF good diversifiers for each other?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.38 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between LAKE and LIF?
The LAKE/LIF correlation stands at 0.38 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.41, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is LIF a good diversifier for LAKE?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.38 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.38 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.38 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lake-vs-lif.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lake-vs-lif/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: LAKE correlations · LIF correlations
