KMPR vs MET: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Kemper Corporation (KMPR) and MetLife (MET) carry a correlation of 0.47, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are KMPR and MET?
On 3 years of weekly data the KMPR/MET correlation comes out at 0.47, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.45 over 1 year against 0.47 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.49, and annualized covariance runs at 352.3 %².
In KMPR's tracked universe of 14 assets, MET sits right near the top at #3. The last year tells two different stories: MET led by 68.3 percentage points, -46.2% for KMPR against +22.1% for MET.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
KMPR vs MET: side by side
| KMPR (Kemper Corporation) | MET (MetLife) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -46.2% | +22.1% |
| 5-year return | -53.7% | +80.8% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 32.1% | 23.3% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.61 | 0.89 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -66.8% | -22.0% |
| Market cap | $1.6B | $61.2B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 18.5 |
| Dividend yield | 4.51% | 2.38% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Financials |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | KMPR | MET |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -14.2% | +19.2% |
| 2023 | +1.5% | -5.5% |
| 2024 | +39.2% | +27.7% |
| 2025 | -37.5% | -0.8% |
| 2026 | -29.5% | +24.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are KMPR and MET good diversifiers for each other?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.47 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between KMPR and MET?
The KMPR/MET correlation stands at 0.47 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.45, 5 years: 0.49), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is MET a good diversifier for KMPR?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.47 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.47 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.47 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/kmpr-vs-met.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/kmpr-vs-met/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: KMPR correlations · MET correlations
