EQH vs KMPR: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Equitable Holdings, Inc. (EQH) and Kemper Corporation (KMPR) carry a correlation of 0.47, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are EQH and KMPR?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of EQH and KMPR correlate at 0.47, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.41 over 1 year against 0.47 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.49, with an annualized covariance of 408.0 %².
Among the 20 assets we track against EQH, KMPR ranks #14 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with EQH ahead by 42.0 points (-4.2% versus -46.2%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
EQH vs KMPR: side by side
| EQH (Equitable Holdings, Inc.) | KMPR (Kemper Corporation) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -4.2% | -46.2% |
| 5-year return | +83.5% | -53.7% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 27.3% | 32.1% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.19 | 0.61 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -35.8% | -66.8% |
| Market cap | $13.7B | $1.6B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 2.29% | 4.51% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | EQH | KMPR |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -10.2% | -14.2% |
| 2023 | +19.6% | +1.5% |
| 2024 | +45.0% | +39.2% |
| 2025 | +3.2% | -37.5% |
| 2026 | +7.4% | -29.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are EQH and KMPR good diversifiers for each other?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.47 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between EQH and KMPR?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between EQH and KMPR is 0.47 over 3 years, 0.41 over 1 year and 0.49 over 5 years.
Is KMPR a good diversifier for EQH?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.47 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.47 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.47 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/eqh-vs-kmpr.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/eqh-vs-kmpr/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: EQH correlations · KMPR correlations
