KIM vs VTR: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Kimco Realty (KIM) and Ventas (VTR) carry a correlation of 0.52, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are KIM and VTR?
Over the past 3 years, KIM and VTR moved with a correlation of 0.52, which is moderate. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.39) runs below the 3-year figure (0.52). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.55, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 253.6 %².
Within KIM's tracked universe of 45 assets, VTR comes in at #28 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months VTR outperformed by 29.0 percentage points (+11.4% for KIM against +40.4% for VTR). Do not treat this figure as fixed: across three years the rolling one-year correlation ranged all the way from 0.12 to 0.75.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
KIM vs VTR: side by side
| KIM (Kimco Realty) | VTR (Ventas) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +11.4% | +40.4% |
| 5-year return | +35.9% | +98.1% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 22.9% | 21.5% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.63 | 0.25 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -25.9% | -16.7% |
| Market cap | $16.0B | $47.6B |
| P/E (trailing) | 28.0 | 168.9 |
| Dividend yield | 4.29% | 2.14% |
| Sector / category | Real Estate | Real Estate |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | KIM | VTR |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -10.8% | -8.5% |
| 2023 | +6.1% | +15.1% |
| 2024 | +15.0% | +22.2% |
| 2025 | -9.3% | +35.1% |
| 2026 | +20.1% | +21.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are KIM and VTR good diversifiers for each other?
Only partially. A correlation of 0.52 means KIM and VTR share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.
FAQ
What is the correlation between KIM and VTR?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between KIM and VTR is 0.52 over 3 years, 0.39 over 1 year and 0.55 over 5 years.
Is VTR a good diversifier for KIM?
Only partially. A correlation of 0.52 means KIM and VTR share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.
What does a correlation of 0.52 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.52 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/kim-vs-vtr.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/kim-vs-vtr/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: KIM correlations · VTR correlations
