PairBook
HomeKIM › KIM vs KRG

KIM vs KRG: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Kimco Realty (KIM) and Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) carry a correlation of 0.85, a very strong link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.85
very strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.86
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.86
long-run
Ann. covariance
421.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are KIM and KRG?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of KIM and KRG correlate at 0.85, very strong, meaning they move nearly in lockstep. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.86 over 1 year against 0.85 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.86, with an annualized covariance of 421.8 %².

Few assets follow KIM as closely as KRG, which ranks #3 of 45 tracked partners. The trailing year gives KRG the advantage: +11.4% versus +20.7%, a 9.3-point spread.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

KIM vs KRG: side by side

KIM (Kimco Realty)KRG (Kite Realty Group Trust)
1-year return+11.4%+20.7%
5-year return+35.9%+61.5%
Volatility (ann.)22.9%21.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.630.58
Max drawdown (3Y)-25.9%-29.1%
Market cap$16.0B$5.3B
P/E (trailing)28.016.5
Dividend yield4.29%4.34%
Sector / categoryReal EstateUS Listed
Lower P/E: KRG 16.5 vs 28.0Higher yield: KRG 4.34% vs 4.29%Smaller drawdown: KIM -25.9% vs -29.1%Higher 5y return: KRG +61.5% vs +35.9%
-11%0%+34%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. KIM · KRG

Year-by-year returns

YearKIMKRG
2022-10.8%+0.8%
2023+6.1%+13.6%
2024+15.0%+15.5%
2025-9.3%-0.2%
2026+20.1%+12.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are KIM and KRG good diversifiers for each other?

No: a correlation of 0.85 means KIM and KRG tend to fall together, which is precisely when diversification is supposed to help.

FAQ

What is the correlation between KIM and KRG?

The KIM/KRG correlation stands at 0.85 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.86, 5 years: 0.86), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is KRG a good diversifier for KIM?

No: a correlation of 0.85 means KIM and KRG tend to fall together, which is precisely when diversification is supposed to help.

What does a correlation of 0.85 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/kim-vs-krg.json

KIM vs KRG: 3-year weekly correlation 0.85KIM vs KRG0.85

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![KIM vs KRG correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/kim-vs-krg.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/kim-vs-krg/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: KIM correlations · KRG correlations