PairBook
HomeKIM › KIM vs NRT

KIM vs NRT: Correlation

Kimco Realty (KIM) and North European Oil Royality Trust (NRT) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.21.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.21
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.18
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.03
long-run
Ann. covariance
-243.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are KIM and NRT?

On 3 years of weekly data the KIM/NRT correlation comes out at -0.21, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.18 over 1 year against -0.21 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.03, and annualized covariance runs at -243.6 %².

Out of 45 assets tracked against KIM, NRT lands near the bottom at #43. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months NRT outperformed by 73.8 percentage points (+11.4% for KIM against +85.2% for NRT). Note the risk asymmetry: NRT runs 2.3 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

KIM vs NRT: side by side

KIM (Kimco Realty)NRT (North European Oil Royality Trust)
1-year return+11.4%+85.2%
5-year return+35.9%+131.5%
Volatility (ann.)22.9%51.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.63-0.42
Max drawdown (3Y)-25.9%-66.1%
Market cap$16.0B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)28.08.4
Dividend yield4.29%11.95%
Sector / categoryReal EstateUS Listed
Lower P/E: NRT 8.4 vs 28.0Higher yield: NRT 11.95% vs 4.29%Smaller drawdown: KIM -25.9% vs -66.1%Higher 5y return: NRT +131.5% vs +35.9%
-11%0%+107%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. KIM · NRT

Year-by-year returns

YearKIMNRT
2022-10.8%+41.9%
2023+6.1%-46.5%
2024+15.0%-25.3%
2025-9.3%+88.4%
2026+20.1%+41.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are KIM and NRT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.21, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between KIM and NRT?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between KIM and NRT is -0.21 over 3 years, -0.18 over 1 year and 0.03 over 5 years.

Is NRT a good diversifier for KIM?

Yes: at -0.21, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?

A reading of -0.21 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/kim-vs-nrt.json

KIM vs NRT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.21KIM vs NRT-0.21

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![KIM vs NRT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/kim-vs-nrt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/kim-vs-nrt/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: KIM correlations · NRT correlations