PairBook
HomeKIM › KIM vs VELO

KIM vs VELO: Correlation

How closely do Kimco Realty (KIM) and Velo3D, Inc. (VELO) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.20, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.06
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.07
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1154.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are KIM and VELO?

Over the past 3 years, KIM and VELO moved with a correlation of -0.20, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.06) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.20). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.07, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1154.4 %².

Out of 45 assets tracked against KIM, VELO lands near the bottom at #41. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months VELO outperformed by 170.5 percentage points (+11.4% for KIM against +181.9% for VELO). Risk is not evenly split, since VELO carries 10.9 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

KIM vs VELO: side by side

KIM (Kimco Realty)VELO (Velo3D, Inc.)
1-year return+11.4%+181.9%
5-year return+35.9%-99.8%
Volatility (ann.)22.9%249.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.63-2.66
Max drawdown (3Y)-25.9%-99.8%
Market cap$16.0B$0.4B
P/E (trailing)28.0
Dividend yield4.29%0.00%
Sector / categoryReal EstateUS Listed
Higher yield: KIM 4.29% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: KIM -25.9% vs -99.8%Higher 5y return: KIM +35.9% vs -99.8%
-16%0%+729%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. KIM · VELO

Year-by-year returns

YearKIMVELO
2022-10.8%-77.1%
2023+6.1%-77.8%
2024+15.0%-95.2%
2025-9.3%+35.7%
2026+20.1%-6.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are KIM and VELO good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.20, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between KIM and VELO?

The KIM/VELO correlation stands at -0.20 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.06, 5 years: -0.07), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VELO a good diversifier for KIM?

Yes: at -0.20, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/kim-vs-velo.json

KIM vs VELO: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20KIM vs VELO-0.20

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![KIM vs VELO correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/kim-vs-velo.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/kim-vs-velo/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: KIM correlations · VELO correlations