PairBook
HomeKIM › KIM vs TRT

KIM vs TRT: Correlation

Kimco Realty (KIM) and Trio-Tech International (TRT) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.19.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.29
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.06
long-run
Ann. covariance
-472.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are KIM and TRT?

On 3 years of weekly data the KIM/TRT correlation comes out at -0.19, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.29) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.06, and annualized covariance runs at -472.7 %².

By 3-year correlation, TRT places #40 of the 45 assets tracked against KIM. The last year tells two different stories: TRT led by 284.1 percentage points, +11.4% for KIM against +295.5% for TRT. Note the risk asymmetry: TRT runs 4.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

KIM vs TRT: side by side

KIM (Kimco Realty)TRT (Trio-Tech International)
1-year return+11.4%+295.5%
5-year return+35.9%+365.8%
Volatility (ann.)22.9%107.4%
Beta vs S&P 5000.630.18
Max drawdown (3Y)-25.9%-54.6%
Market cap$16.0B
P/E (trailing)28.0209.6
Dividend yield4.29%0.00%
Sector / categoryReal EstateUS Listed
Lower P/E: KIM 28.0 vs 209.6Higher yield: KIM 4.29% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: KIM -25.9% vs -54.6%Higher 5y return: TRT +365.8% vs +35.9%
-11%0%+647%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). KIM · TRT

Year-by-year returns

YearKIMTRT
2022-10.8%-66.5%
2023+6.1%+12.7%
2024+15.0%+14.6%
2025-9.3%+127.9%
2026+20.1%+58.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are KIM and TRT good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between KIM and TRT?

The KIM/TRT correlation stands at -0.19 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.29, 5 years: -0.06), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is TRT a good diversifier for KIM?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/kim-vs-trt.json

KIM vs TRT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19KIM vs TRT-0.19

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![KIM vs TRT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/kim-vs-trt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/kim-vs-trt/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: KIM correlations · TRT correlations