PairBook
HomeKIM › KIM vs TOMZ

KIM vs TOMZ: Correlation

How closely do Kimco Realty (KIM) and TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc. (TOMZ) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.19, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.31
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.04
long-run
Ann. covariance
-302.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are KIM and TOMZ?

On 3 years of weekly data the KIM/TOMZ correlation comes out at -0.19, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.31) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.19). The 5-year figure is -0.04, and annualized covariance runs at -302.2 %².

By 3-year correlation, TOMZ places #39 of the 45 assets tracked against KIM. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months KIM outperformed by 40.3 percentage points (+11.4% for KIM against -28.9% for TOMZ). One caveat on sizing: TOMZ is 3.0 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

KIM vs TOMZ: side by side

KIM (Kimco Realty)TOMZ (TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc.)
1-year return+11.4%-28.9%
5-year return+35.9%-66.5%
Volatility (ann.)22.9%68.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.631.00
Max drawdown (3Y)-25.9%-61.6%
Market cap$16.0B
P/E (trailing)28.0
Dividend yield4.29%0.00%
Sector / categoryReal EstateUS Listed
Higher yield: KIM 4.29% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: KIM -25.9% vs -61.6%Higher 5y return: KIM +35.9% vs -66.5%
-42%0%+19%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). KIM · TOMZ

Year-by-year returns

YearKIMTOMZ
2022-10.8%-70.3%
2023+6.1%+106.1%
2024+15.0%+4.0%
2025-9.3%-25.7%
2026+20.1%-24.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are KIM and TOMZ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between KIM and TOMZ?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between KIM and TOMZ is -0.19 over 3 years, -0.31 over 1 year and -0.04 over 5 years.

Is TOMZ a good diversifier for KIM?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.19 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/kim-vs-tomz.json

KIM vs TOMZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19KIM vs TOMZ-0.19

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![KIM vs TOMZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/kim-vs-tomz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/kim-vs-tomz/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: KIM correlations · TOMZ correlations