PairBook
HomeKIM › KIM vs SJM

KIM vs SJM: Correlation

Kimco Realty (KIM) and J.M. Smucker Company (The) (SJM) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.40.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.40
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.45
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.32
long-run
Ann. covariance
240.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are KIM and SJM?

On 3 years of weekly data the KIM/SJM correlation comes out at 0.40, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.45 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.32, and annualized covariance runs at 240.9 %².

Among the 45 assets we track against KIM, SJM ranks #31 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with SJM ahead by 18.5 points (+11.4% versus +29.9%). Across three years, the rolling one-year figure varied moderately, from 0.20 to 0.60.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
One-year correlation, rolled weekly across the last three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

KIM vs SJM: side by side

KIM (Kimco Realty)SJM (J.M. Smucker Company (The))
1-year return+11.4%+29.9%
5-year return+35.9%+28.2%
Volatility (ann.)22.9%26.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.630.21
Max drawdown (3Y)-25.9%-32.5%
Market cap$16.0B$14.1B
P/E (trailing)28.061.3
Dividend yield4.29%3.38%
Sector / categoryReal EstateConsumer Staples
Lower P/E: KIM 28.0 vs 61.3Higher yield: KIM 4.29% vs 3.38%Smaller drawdown: KIM -25.9% vs -32.5%Higher 5y return: KIM +35.9% vs +28.2%
-18%0%+22%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). KIM · SJM

Year-by-year returns

YearKIMSJM
2022-10.8%+20.1%
2023+6.1%-17.8%
2024+15.0%-9.6%
2025-9.3%-7.6%
2026+20.1%+38.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are KIM and SJM good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.40, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between KIM and SJM?

The KIM/SJM correlation stands at 0.40 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.45, 5 years: 0.32), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is SJM a good diversifier for KIM?

A fair diversifier. At 0.40, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.40 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/kim-vs-sjm.json

KIM vs SJM: 3-year weekly correlation 0.40KIM vs SJM0.40

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![KIM vs SJM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/kim-vs-sjm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/kim-vs-sjm/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: KIM correlations · SJM correlations