KELYB vs TTWO: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYB) and Take-Two Interactive (TTWO) carry a correlation of -0.18, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are KELYB and TTWO?
Over the past 3 years, KELYB and TTWO moved with a correlation of -0.18, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.20 over 1 year against -0.18 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.09, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -299.0 %².
TTWO is close to the least connected end of KELYB's tracked universe, ranking #8 of 12. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months KELYB outperformed by 62.4 percentage points (+62.8% for KELYB against +0.4% for TTWO). Note the risk asymmetry: KELYB runs 2.2 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
KELYB vs TTWO: side by side
| KELYB (Kelly Services, Inc.) | TTWO (Take-Two Interactive) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +62.8% | +0.4% |
| 5-year return | +26.3% | +47.3% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 60.8% | 27.3% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.40 | 0.85 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -66.9% | -27.7% |
| Market cap | $0.8B | $43.6B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 1.38% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Communication Services |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | KELYB | TTWO |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +3.1% | -41.4% |
| 2023 | +27.5% | +54.6% |
| 2024 | -34.7% | +14.4% |
| 2025 | -35.9% | +39.1% |
| 2026 | +170.6% | -9.0% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are KELYB and TTWO good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.18, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between KELYB and TTWO?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.18 over 3 years, with -0.20 over the last year and -0.09 over 5 years.
Is TTWO a good diversifier for KELYB?
Yes: at -0.18, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.18 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.18 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/kelyb-vs-ttwo.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/kelyb-vs-ttwo/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: KELYB correlations · TTWO correlations
