PairBook
HomeJXG › JXG vs STZ

JXG vs STZ: Correlation

How closely do JX Luxventure Group Inc. (JXG) and Constellation Brands (STZ) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.31, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.31
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.07
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.21
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1366.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are JXG and STZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of JXG and STZ correlate at -0.31, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.07 versus -0.31 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.21, with an annualized covariance of -1366.7 %².

STZ is close to the least connected end of JXG's tracked universe, ranking #18 of 20. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months STZ outperformed by 26.1 percentage points (-41.8% for JXG against -15.7% for STZ). Risk is not evenly split, since JXG carries 6.3 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

JXG vs STZ: side by side

JXG (JX Luxventure Group Inc.)STZ (Constellation Brands)
1-year return-41.8%-15.7%
5-year return-98.5%-31.9%
Volatility (ann.)167.5%26.6%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.190.41
Max drawdown (3Y)-94.0%-51.3%
Market cap$0.1B$22.4B
P/E (trailing)12.8
Dividend yield0.00%3.04%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Staples
Higher yield: STZ 3.04% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: STZ -51.3% vs -94.0%Higher 5y return: STZ -31.9% vs -98.5%
-75%0%+14%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. JXG · STZ

Year-by-year returns

YearJXGSTZ
2022-63.7%-6.4%
2023-83.8%+5.8%
2024-19.5%-7.1%
2025-62.6%-36.0%
2026+48.5%-2.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are JXG and STZ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.31 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between JXG and STZ?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.31 over 3 years, with -0.07 over the last year and -0.21 over 5 years.

Is STZ a good diversifier for JXG?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.31 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.31 mean?

A reading of -0.31 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/jxg-vs-stz.json

JXG vs STZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.31JXG vs STZ-0.31

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![JXG vs STZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/jxg-vs-stz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/jxg-vs-stz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: JXG correlations · STZ correlations