PairBook
HomeJL › JL vs OMC

JL vs OMC: Correlation

How closely do J-Long Group Limited - Class A (JL) and Omnicom Group (OMC) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.27, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.27
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.05
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-4624.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are JL and OMC?

Over the past 3 years, JL and OMC moved with a correlation of -0.27, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.05 versus -0.27 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -4624.6 %².

Among the 58 assets we track against JL, OMC ranks #45 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: OMC led by 32.9 percentage points, -16.4% for JL against +16.5% for OMC. Note the risk asymmetry: JL runs 20.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

JL vs OMC: side by side

JL (J-Long Group Limited - Class A)OMC (Omnicom Group)
1-year return-16.4%+16.5%
5-year returnn/a+45.6%
Volatility (ann.)580.0%28.0%
Beta vs S&P 500-1.020.76
Max drawdown (3Y)-98.6%-33.3%
Market cap$24.1B
P/E (trailing)6.5237.5
Dividend yield0.00%3.53%
Sector / categoryUS ListedCommunication Services
Lower P/E: JL 6.5 vs 237.5Higher yield: OMC 3.53% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: OMC -33.3% vs -98.6%
-41%0%+20%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). JL · OMC

Year-by-year returns

YearJLOMC
2022+15.7%
2023+9.6%
2024+2.5%
2025+67.1%-2.6%
2026-20.1%+11.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are JL and OMC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.27, JL and OMC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between JL and OMC?

The JL/OMC correlation stands at -0.27 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.05, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is OMC a good diversifier for JL?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.27, JL and OMC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.27 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/jl-vs-omc.json

JL vs OMC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.27JL vs OMC-0.27

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![JL vs OMC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/jl-vs-omc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/jl-vs-omc/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: JL correlations · OMC correlations