JILL vs MCFT: Correlation
J. Jill, Inc. (JILL) and MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. (MCFT) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.49.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are JILL and MCFT?
Over the past 3 years, JILL and MCFT moved with a correlation of 0.49, which is moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.55 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.39, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 901.2 %².
MCFT is one of the assets that tracks JILL most closely: it ranks #2 out of the 14 assets we track against JILL. Over the last 12 months JILL came out ahead by 13.2 percentage points (+18.8% against +5.6%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
JILL vs MCFT: side by side
| JILL (J. Jill, Inc.) | MCFT (MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +18.8% | +5.6% |
| 5-year return | -1.2% | -7.0% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 47.4% | 39.1% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.17 | 1.03 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -71.5% | -41.1% |
| Market cap | $0.3B | $0.6B |
| P/E (trailing) | 14.5 | 36.1 |
| Dividend yield | 1.66% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | JILL | MCFT |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +29.3% | -8.7% |
| 2023 | +4.0% | -12.5% |
| 2024 | +7.9% | -15.8% |
| 2025 | -49.3% | -0.8% |
| 2026 | +46.5% | +27.9% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are JILL and MCFT good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.49, JILL and MCFT keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between JILL and MCFT?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between JILL and MCFT is 0.49 over 3 years, 0.55 over 1 year and 0.39 over 5 years.
Is MCFT a good diversifier for JILL?
Reasonably. At 0.49, JILL and MCFT keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.49 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/jill-vs-mcft.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/jill-vs-mcft/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: JILL correlations · MCFT correlations
