PairBook
HomeJCTC › JCTC vs LB

JCTC vs LB: Correlation

Jewett-Cameron Trading Company (JCTC) and LandBridge Company LLC Class A Shares Representing Limited (LB) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.21.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.21
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.19
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-633.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are JCTC and LB?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of JCTC and LB correlate at -0.21, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.19) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -633.4 %².

Out of 10 assets tracked against JCTC, LB lands near the bottom at #8. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months LB outperformed by 92.0 percentage points (-18.8% for JCTC against +73.2% for LB).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

JCTC vs LB: side by side

JCTC (Jewett-Cameron Trading Company)LB (LandBridge Company LLC Class A Shares Representing Limited)
1-year return-18.8%+73.2%
5-year return-72.2%n/a
Volatility (ann.)44.2%63.4%
Beta vs S&P 5000.371.65
Max drawdown (3Y)-74.1%-48.2%
Market cap$6.9B
P/E (trailing)79.0
Dividend yield0.00%0.50%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: LB 0.50% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: LB -48.2% vs -74.1%
-54%0%+73%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). JCTC · LB

Year-by-year returns

YearJCTCLB
2022-32.4%
2023-4.7%
2024-14.5%
2025-51.5%-23.7%
2026+30.2%+82.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are JCTC and LB good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.21, JCTC and LB have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between JCTC and LB?

The JCTC/LB correlation stands at -0.21 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.19, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is LB a good diversifier for JCTC?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.21, JCTC and LB have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?

A reading of -0.21 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/jctc-vs-lb.json

JCTC vs LB: 3-year weekly correlation -0.21JCTC vs LB-0.21

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![JCTC vs LB correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/jctc-vs-lb.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/jctc-vs-lb/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: JCTC correlations · LB correlations