PairBook
HomeLB › LB vs TPL

LB vs TPL: Correlation

How closely do LandBridge Company LLC Class A Shares Representing Limited (LB) and Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.63, which is strong.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.63
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.61
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
2099.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LB and TPL?

On 3 years of weekly data the LB/TPL correlation comes out at 0.63, strong. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.61) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at 2099.6 %².

TPL is one of the assets that tracks LB most closely: it ranks #1 out of the 15 assets we track against LB. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months LB outperformed by 50.4 percentage points (+73.2% for LB against +22.8% for TPL).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LB vs TPL: side by side

LB (LandBridge Company LLC Class A Shares Representing Limited)TPL (Texas Pacific Land Corporation)
1-year return+73.2%+22.8%
5-year returnn/a+149.6%
Volatility (ann.)63.4%50.0%
Beta vs S&P 5001.650.62
Max drawdown (3Y)-48.2%-52.2%
Market cap$6.9B$25.5B
P/E (trailing)79.047.2
Dividend yield0.50%0.61%
Sector / categoryUS ListedEnergy
Lower P/E: TPL 47.2 vs 79.0Higher yield: TPL 0.61% vs 0.50%Smaller drawdown: LB -48.2% vs -52.2%
-7%0%+80%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). LB · TPL

Year-by-year returns

YearLBTPL
2022+91.3%
2023-32.4%
2024+115.3%
2025-23.7%-21.6%
2026+82.7%+29.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LB and TPL good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.63 means LB and TPL share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LB and TPL?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between LB and TPL is 0.63 over 3 years, 0.61 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is TPL a good diversifier for LB?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.63 means LB and TPL share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.63 mean?

A reading of 0.63 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lb-vs-tpl.json

LB vs TPL: 3-year weekly correlation 0.63LB vs TPL0.63

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![LB vs TPL correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lb-vs-tpl.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lb-vs-tpl/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LB correlations · TPL correlations