PairBook
HomeIPW › IPW vs LII

IPW vs LII: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, iPower Inc. (IPW) and Lennox International (LII) carry a correlation of -0.34, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.34
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.60
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.23
long-run
Ann. covariance
-4391.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are IPW and LII?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of IPW and LII correlate at -0.34, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.60) than the 3-year average (-0.34). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.23, with an annualized covariance of -4391.7 %².

Among the 37 assets we track against IPW, LII sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #33. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months LII outperformed by 68.3 percentage points (-98.6% for IPW against -30.3% for LII). Note the risk asymmetry: IPW runs 12.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

IPW vs LII: side by side

IPW (iPower Inc.)LII (Lennox International)
1-year return-98.6%-30.3%
5-year return-99.8%+23.7%
Volatility (ann.)405.9%32.0%
Beta vs S&P 5002.990.96
Max drawdown (3Y)-100.0%-41.7%
Market cap$13.5B
P/E (trailing)17.5
Dividend yield0.00%1.34%
Sector / categoryUS ListedIndustrials
Higher yield: LII 1.34% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: LII -41.7% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: LII +23.7% vs -99.8%
-100%0%+28%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. IPW · LII

Year-by-year returns

YearIPWLII
2022-83.2%-24.9%
2023+12.5%+89.5%
2024+85.1%+37.3%
2025-70.1%-19.5%
2026-96.8%-19.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are IPW and LII good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.34 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between IPW and LII?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.34 over 3 years, with -0.60 over the last year and -0.23 over 5 years.

Is LII a good diversifier for IPW?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.34 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.34 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.34 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ipw-vs-lii.json

IPW vs LII: 3-year weekly correlation -0.34IPW vs LII-0.34

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![IPW vs LII correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ipw-vs-lii.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ipw-vs-lii/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: IPW correlations · LII correlations