PairBook
HomeIPW › IPW vs MNST

IPW vs MNST: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, iPower Inc. (IPW) and Monster Beverage (MNST) carry a correlation of -0.36, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.36
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.44
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.33
long-run
Ann. covariance
-9885.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are IPW and MNST?

Over the past 3 years, IPW and MNST moved with a correlation of -0.36, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.44 over 1 year against -0.36 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.33, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -9885.4 %².

Among the 37 assets we track against IPW, MNST sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #35. The last year tells two different stories: MNST led by 74.3 percentage points, -98.6% for IPW against -24.3% for MNST. Note the risk asymmetry: IPW runs 5.9 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

IPW vs MNST: side by side

IPW (iPower Inc.)MNST (Monster Beverage)
1-year return-98.6%-24.3%
5-year return-99.8%-4.5%
Volatility (ann.)405.9%68.6%
Beta vs S&P 5002.990.80
Max drawdown (3Y)-100.0%-54.5%
Market cap$91.5B
P/E (trailing)43.2
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Staples
Smaller drawdown: MNST -54.5% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: MNST -4.5% vs -99.8%
-100%0%+56%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). IPW · MNST

Year-by-year returns

YearIPWMNST
2022-83.2%+5.7%
2023+12.5%+13.5%
2024+85.1%-8.8%
2025-70.1%+45.9%
2026-96.8%-39.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are IPW and MNST good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.36, IPW and MNST have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between IPW and MNST?

The IPW/MNST correlation stands at -0.36 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.44, 5 years: -0.33), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is MNST a good diversifier for IPW?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.36, IPW and MNST have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.36 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ipw-vs-mnst.json

IPW vs MNST: 3-year weekly correlation -0.36IPW vs MNST-0.36

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![IPW vs MNST correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ipw-vs-mnst.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ipw-vs-mnst/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: IPW correlations · MNST correlations