PairBook
HomeIP › IP vs MCFT

IP vs MCFT: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, International Paper (IP) and MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. (MCFT) carry a correlation of 0.50, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.50
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.57
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.47
long-run
Ann. covariance
740.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are IP and MCFT?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of IP and MCFT correlate at 0.50, moderate. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.57) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.47, with an annualized covariance of 740.0 %².

Among the 29 assets we track against IP, MCFT ranks #15 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months MCFT outperformed by 19.1 percentage points (-13.5% for IP against +5.6% for MCFT).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

IP vs MCFT: side by side

IP (International Paper)MCFT (MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc.)
1-year return-13.5%+5.6%
5-year return-11.2%-7.0%
Volatility (ann.)37.8%39.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.771.03
Max drawdown (3Y)-48.6%-41.1%
Market cap$21.1B$0.6B
P/E (trailing)36.1
Dividend yield4.47%0.00%
Sector / categoryMaterialsUS Listed
Higher yield: IP 4.47% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MCFT -41.1% vs -48.6%Higher 5y return: MCFT -7.0% vs -11.2%
-36%0%+19%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. IP · MCFT

Year-by-year returns

YearIPMCFT
2022-23.0%-8.7%
2023+10.2%-12.5%
2024+55.3%-15.8%
2025-23.8%-0.8%
2026+5.0%+27.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are IP and MCFT good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.50 means IP and MCFT share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between IP and MCFT?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.50 over 3 years, with 0.57 over the last year and 0.47 over 5 years.

Is MCFT a good diversifier for IP?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.50 means IP and MCFT share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.50 mean?

A reading of 0.50 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ip-vs-mcft.json

IP vs MCFT: 3-year weekly correlation 0.50IP vs MCFT0.50

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![IP vs MCFT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ip-vs-mcft.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ip-vs-mcft/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: IP correlations · MCFT correlations