PairBook
HomeINTZ › INTZ vs XBIT

INTZ vs XBIT: Correlation

Intrusion Inc. (INTZ) and XBiotech Inc. (XBIT) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.29.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.29
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.16
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.22
long-run
Ann. covariance
-4935.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are INTZ and XBIT?

On 3 years of weekly data the INTZ/XBIT correlation comes out at -0.29, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.16) than the 3-year average (-0.29). The 5-year figure is -0.22, and annualized covariance runs at -4935.3 %².

Among the 31 assets we track against INTZ, XBIT sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #31. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months XBIT outperformed by 22.1 percentage points (-56.0% for INTZ against -33.9% for XBIT). Risk is not evenly split, since INTZ carries 4.6 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

INTZ vs XBIT: side by side

INTZ (Intrusion Inc.)XBIT (XBiotech Inc.)
1-year return-56.0%-33.9%
5-year return-99.1%-85.8%
Volatility (ann.)281.6%60.9%
Beta vs S&P 5002.381.09
Max drawdown (3Y)-97.9%-78.6%
Market cap$0.1B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: XBIT -78.6% vs -97.9%Higher 5y return: XBIT -85.8% vs -99.1%
-62%0%+17%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. INTZ · XBIT

Year-by-year returns

YearINTZXBIT
2022-8.1%-68.5%
2023-92.1%+14.0%
2024-38.4%-1.2%
2025-62.7%-39.5%
2026-29.6%-3.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are INTZ and XBIT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.29, INTZ and XBIT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between INTZ and XBIT?

The INTZ/XBIT correlation stands at -0.29 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.16, 5 years: -0.22), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is XBIT a good diversifier for INTZ?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.29, INTZ and XBIT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.29 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/intz-vs-xbit.json

INTZ vs XBIT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.29INTZ vs XBIT-0.29

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![INTZ vs XBIT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/intz-vs-xbit.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/intz-vs-xbit/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: INTZ correlations · XBIT correlations