PairBook
HomeINTR › INTR vs UMAC

INTR vs UMAC: Correlation

Inter & Co. Inc. - Class A (INTR) and Unusual Machines, Inc. (UMAC) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.25.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.25
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.07
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2588.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are INTR and UMAC?

Over the past 3 years, INTR and UMAC moved with a correlation of -0.25, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.07) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.25). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -2588.6 %².

Among the 13 assets we track against INTR, UMAC sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #11. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with UMAC ahead by 192.2 points (-35.1% versus +157.1%). Note the risk asymmetry: UMAC runs 5.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

INTR vs UMAC: side by side

INTR (Inter & Co. Inc. - Class A)UMAC (Unusual Machines, Inc.)
1-year return-35.1%+157.1%
5-year return+59.8%n/a
Volatility (ann.)43.3%248.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.643.43
Max drawdown (3Y)-49.9%-75.6%
Market cap$2.4B$1.3B
P/E (trailing)8.3
Dividend yield11.27%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: INTR 11.27% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: INTR -49.9% vs -75.6%
-40%0%+256%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. INTR · UMAC

Year-by-year returns

YearINTRUMAC
2023+134.6%
2024-23.7%
2025+104.0%-24.3%
2026-35.8%+106.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are INTR and UMAC good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.25 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between INTR and UMAC?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.25 over 3 years, with -0.07 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is UMAC a good diversifier for INTR?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.25 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?

A reading of -0.25 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/intr-vs-umac.json

INTR vs UMAC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.25INTR vs UMAC-0.25

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![INTR vs UMAC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/intr-vs-umac.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/intr-vs-umac/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: INTR correlations · UMAC correlations