PairBook
HomeIMO › IMO vs XLE

IMO vs XLE: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) and Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE) carry a correlation of 0.75, a strong link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.75
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.74
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.80
long-run
Ann. covariance
495.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are IMO and XLE?

Over the past 3 years, IMO and XLE moved with a correlation of 0.75, which is strong. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.74) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.80, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 495.4 %².

Within IMO's tracked universe of 12 assets, XLE comes in at #4 by 3-year correlation. The trailing year gives IMO the advantage: +50.4% versus +44.0%, a 6.4-point spread.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

IMO vs XLE: side by side

IMO (Imperial Oil Limited)XLE (Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund)
1-year return+50.4%+44.0%
5-year return+468.0%+206.7%
Volatility (ann.)28.8%23.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.240.27
Max drawdown (3Y)-22.9%-20.1%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)21.2
Dividend yield2.42%2.55%
Expense ratio0.08%
Assets under management$39.2B
Sector / categoryUS ListedSector ETF
Higher yield: XLE 2.55% vs 2.42%Smaller drawdown: XLE -20.1% vs -22.9%Higher 5y return: IMO +468.0% vs +206.7%

XLE is an Equity Energy fund from State Street Investment Management: $39.2B under management, 22 holdings, a 0.08% expense ratio, a 2.55% trailing dividend yield.

-3%0%+61%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. IMO · XLE

Year-by-year returns

YearIMOXLE
2022+38.0%+64.3%
2023+20.6%-0.6%
2024+10.5%+5.6%
2025+43.8%+7.9%
2026+54.8%+41.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are IMO and XLE good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.75 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between IMO and XLE?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between IMO and XLE is 0.75 over 3 years, 0.74 over 1 year and 0.80 over 5 years.

Is XLE a good diversifier for IMO?

To a limited degree. At 0.75 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.75 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.75 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/imo-vs-xle.json

IMO vs XLE: 3-year weekly correlation 0.75IMO vs XLE0.75

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![IMO vs XLE correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/imo-vs-xle.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/imo-vs-xle/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: IMO correlations · XLE correlations