PairBook
HomeICCM › ICCM vs IMO

ICCM vs IMO: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, IceCure Medical Ltd. (ICCM) and Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) carry a correlation of -0.22, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.27
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.12
long-run
Ann. covariance
-731.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ICCM and IMO?

On 3 years of weekly data the ICCM/IMO correlation comes out at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.27 over 1 year against -0.22 over 3. The 5-year figure is -0.12, and annualized covariance runs at -731.0 %².

Among the 41 assets we track against ICCM, IMO ranks #20 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: IMO led by 142.7 percentage points, -92.3% for ICCM against +50.4% for IMO. Risk is not evenly split, since ICCM carries 4.1 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ICCM vs IMO: side by side

ICCM (IceCure Medical Ltd.)IMO (Imperial Oil Limited)
1-year return-92.3%+50.4%
5-year return-99.3%+468.0%
Volatility (ann.)117.6%28.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.410.24
Max drawdown (3Y)-95.4%-22.9%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)21.2
Dividend yield0.00%2.42%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: IMO 2.42% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: IMO -22.9% vs -95.4%Higher 5y return: IMO +468.0% vs -99.3%
-93%0%+61%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). ICCM · IMO

Year-by-year returns

YearICCMIMO
2022-49.2%+38.0%
2023-31.0%+20.6%
2024+2.8%+10.5%
2025-44.5%+43.8%
2026-87.5%+54.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ICCM and IMO good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ICCM and IMO?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ICCM and IMO is -0.22 over 3 years, -0.27 over 1 year and -0.12 over 5 years.

Is IMO a good diversifier for ICCM?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/iccm-vs-imo.json

ICCM vs IMO: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22ICCM vs IMO-0.22

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![ICCM vs IMO correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/iccm-vs-imo.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/iccm-vs-imo/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ICCM correlations · IMO correlations