PairBook
HomeIMKTA › IMKTA vs TR

IMKTA vs TR: Correlation

Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA) and Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.39.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.39
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.55
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.41
long-run
Ann. covariance
244.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are IMKTA and TR?

Over the past 3 years, IMKTA and TR moved with a correlation of 0.39, which is moderate. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.55) than the 3-year average (0.39). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.41, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 244.5 %².

By 3-year correlation, TR places #6 of the 13 assets tracked against IMKTA. The last year tells two different stories: IMKTA led by 18.4 percentage points, +22.5% for IMKTA against +4.1% for TR.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

IMKTA vs TR: side by side

IMKTA (Ingles Markets, Incorporated)TR (Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.)
1-year return+22.5%+4.1%
5-year return+28.3%+57.7%
Volatility (ann.)24.9%25.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.170.05
Max drawdown (3Y)-32.0%-20.0%
Market cap$1.6B$3.1B
P/E (trailing)15.232.2
Dividend yield0.79%0.84%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: IMKTA 15.2 vs 32.2Higher yield: TR 0.84% vs 0.79%Smaller drawdown: TR -20.0% vs -32.0%Higher 5y return: TR +57.7% vs +28.3%
-13%0%+34%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). IMKTA · TR

Year-by-year returns

YearIMKTATR
2022+12.6%+22.3%
2023-9.8%-18.8%
2024-24.7%+1.4%
2025+7.4%+17.9%
2026+20.7%+15.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are IMKTA and TR good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.39 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between IMKTA and TR?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.39 over 3 years, with 0.55 over the last year and 0.41 over 5 years.

Is TR a good diversifier for IMKTA?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.39 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.39 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.39 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/imkta-vs-tr.json

IMKTA vs TR: 3-year weekly correlation 0.39IMKTA vs TR0.39

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![IMKTA vs TR correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/imkta-vs-tr.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/imkta-vs-tr/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: IMKTA correlations · TR correlations