PairBook
HomeCHSN › CHSN vs IMKTA

CHSN vs IMKTA: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Chanson International Holding - Class A (CHSN) and Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA) carry a correlation of -0.28, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.28
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.12
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2219.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CHSN and IMKTA?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CHSN and IMKTA correlate at -0.28, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.12 versus -0.28 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -2219.3 %².

Out of 18 assets tracked against CHSN, IMKTA lands near the bottom at #15. The last year tells two different stories: IMKTA led by 121.9 percentage points, -99.4% for CHSN against +22.5% for IMKTA. Risk is not evenly split, since CHSN carries 12.9 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CHSN vs IMKTA: side by side

CHSN (Chanson International Holding - Class A)IMKTA (Ingles Markets, Incorporated)
1-year return-99.4%+22.5%
5-year returnn/a+28.3%
Volatility (ann.)320.2%24.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.540.17
Max drawdown (3Y)-100.0%-32.0%
Market cap$1.6B
P/E (trailing)0.415.2
Dividend yield0.00%0.79%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: CHSN 0.4 vs 15.2Higher yield: IMKTA 0.79% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: IMKTA -32.0% vs -100.0%
-100%0%+42%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CHSN · IMKTA

Year-by-year returns

YearCHSNIMKTA
2022+12.6%
2023-9.8%
2024+318.9%-24.7%
2025-99.5%+7.4%
2026-99.5%+20.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CHSN and IMKTA good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.28, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CHSN and IMKTA?

The CHSN/IMKTA correlation stands at -0.28 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.12, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is IMKTA a good diversifier for CHSN?

Yes: at -0.28, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.28 mean?

A reading of -0.28 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/chsn-vs-imkta.json

CHSN vs IMKTA: 3-year weekly correlation -0.28CHSN vs IMKTA-0.28

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CHSN vs IMKTA correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/chsn-vs-imkta.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/chsn-vs-imkta/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CHSN correlations · IMKTA correlations