PairBook
HomeIEMG › IEMG vs KWEB

IEMG vs KWEB: Correlation

How closely do iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.61, which is strong.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.61
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.46
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.67
long-run
Ann. covariance
358.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are IEMG and KWEB?

Over the past 3 years, IEMG and KWEB moved with a correlation of 0.61, which is strong. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.46) runs below the 3-year figure (0.61). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.67, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 358.3 %².

Within IEMG's tracked universe of 68 assets, KWEB comes in at #33 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with IEMG ahead by 62.1 points (+36.0% versus -26.1%). Across three years, the rolling one-year figure varied moderately, from 0.48 to 0.85. One caveat on sizing: KWEB is 1.9 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
Rolling one-year correlation of weekly returns over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

IEMG vs KWEB: side by side

IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF)KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF)
1-year return+36.0%-26.1%
5-year return+50.7%-36.2%
Volatility (ann.)17.4%33.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.840.90
Max drawdown (3Y)-17.2%-41.6%
Dividend yield2.31%
Expense ratio0.09%
Assets under management$152.2B
Sector / categoryETF · InternationalETF · Thematic
Smaller drawdown: IEMG -17.2% vs -41.6%Higher 5y return: IEMG +50.7% vs -36.2%

On the fund side, IEMG sits in the Diversified Emerging Mkts category at iShares, with $152.2B under management, 1824 holdings, a 0.09% expense ratio, a 2.31% trailing dividend yield.

-34%0%+40%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. IEMG · KWEB

Year-by-year returns

YearIEMGKWEB
2022-20.0%-17.2%
2023+11.5%-9.1%
2024+6.5%+12.0%
2025+32.6%+23.5%
2026+23.6%-23.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are IEMG and KWEB good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.61 means IEMG and KWEB share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between IEMG and KWEB?

The IEMG/KWEB correlation stands at 0.61 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.46, 5 years: 0.67), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is KWEB a good diversifier for IEMG?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.61 means IEMG and KWEB share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.61 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/iemg-vs-kweb.json

IEMG vs KWEB: 3-year weekly correlation 0.61IEMG vs KWEB0.61

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![IEMG vs KWEB correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/iemg-vs-kweb.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/iemg-vs-kweb/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: IEMG correlations · KWEB correlations