PairBook
HomeICU › ICU vs NMG

ICU vs NMG: Correlation

How closely do SeaStar Medical Holding Corporation (ICU) and Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. (NMG) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.25, which is weak.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.25
weak
Correlation (1Y)
0.42
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.18
long-run
Ann. covariance
2856.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ICU and NMG?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of ICU and NMG correlate at 0.25, weak. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.42 versus 0.25 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.18, with an annualized covariance of 2856.5 %².

Among the 10 assets we track against ICU, NMG ranks #4 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months NMG outperformed by 41.6 percentage points (-63.4% for ICU against -21.8% for NMG). Risk is not evenly split, since ICU carries 2.2 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ICU vs NMG: side by side

ICU (SeaStar Medical Holding Corporation)NMG (Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc.)
1-year return-63.4%-21.8%
5-year return-99.9%-77.4%
Volatility (ann.)156.9%72.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.821.20
Max drawdown (3Y)-99.4%-75.1%
Market cap$0.5B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: NMG -75.1% vs -99.4%Higher 5y return: NMG -77.4% vs -99.9%
-72%0%+75%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). ICU · NMG

Year-by-year returns

YearICUNMG
2022-59.2%-45.4%
2023-89.2%-31.7%
2024-82.5%-39.1%
2025-87.6%+56.0%
2026+29.2%-39.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ICU and NMG good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.25 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ICU and NMG?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ICU and NMG is 0.25 over 3 years, 0.42 over 1 year and 0.18 over 5 years.

Is NMG a good diversifier for ICU?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.25 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.25 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.25 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/icu-vs-nmg.json

ICU vs NMG: 3-year weekly correlation 0.25ICU vs NMG0.25

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![ICU vs NMG correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/icu-vs-nmg.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/icu-vs-nmg/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ICU correlations · NMG correlations