PairBook
HomeHUBS › HUBS vs VXZ

HUBS vs VXZ: Correlation

HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.29.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.29
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.15
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.37
long-run
Ann. covariance
-374.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are HUBS and VXZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of HUBS and VXZ correlate at -0.29, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.15) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.29). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.37, with an annualized covariance of -374.3 %².

Out of 30 assets tracked against HUBS, VXZ lands near the bottom at #29. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with VXZ ahead by 29.4 points (-45.5% versus -16.1%). One caveat on sizing: HUBS is 2.0 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

HUBS vs VXZ: side by side

HUBS (HubSpot, Inc.)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return-45.5%-16.1%
5-year return-63.5%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)50.4%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.18-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-79.2%-36.4%
Market cap$13.1B
P/E (trailing)90.7
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -79.2%Higher 5y return: VXZ -53.1% vs -63.5%
-64%0%+9%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. HUBS · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearHUBSVXZ
2022-56.1%+0.5%
2023+100.8%-44.0%
2024+20.0%-12.7%
2025-42.4%+5.7%
2026-36.2%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are HUBS and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.29, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between HUBS and VXZ?

The HUBS/VXZ correlation stands at -0.29 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.15, 5 years: -0.37), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for HUBS?

Yes: at -0.29, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.29 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.29 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/hubs-vs-vxz.json

HUBS vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.29HUBS vs VXZ-0.29

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![HUBS vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/hubs-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/hubs-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: HUBS correlations · VXZ correlations