PairBook
HomeGT › GT vs KMT

GT vs KMT: Correlation

The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) and Kennametal Inc. (KMT) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.55.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.55
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.57
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.54
long-run
Ann. covariance
845.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GT and KMT?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of GT and KMT correlate at 0.55, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.57 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.54, with an annualized covariance of 845.6 %².

Few assets follow GT as closely as KMT, which ranks #1 of 11 tracked partners. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months KMT outperformed by 71.5 percentage points (-28.2% for GT against +43.3% for KMT).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GT vs KMT: side by side

GT (The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company)KMT (Kennametal Inc.)
1-year return-28.2%+43.3%
5-year return-61.1%-6.6%
Volatility (ann.)45.0%33.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.800.73
Max drawdown (3Y)-62.8%-42.9%
Market cap$1.8B$2.3B
P/E (trailing)6.8
Dividend yield0.00%2.67%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: KMT 2.67% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: KMT -42.9% vs -62.8%Higher 5y return: KMT -6.6% vs -61.1%
-34%0%+86%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. GT · KMT

Year-by-year returns

YearGTKMT
2022-52.4%-31.0%
2023+41.1%+10.5%
2024-37.2%-3.9%
2025-2.7%+22.6%
2026-29.8%+8.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GT and KMT good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.55 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GT and KMT?

The GT/KMT correlation stands at 0.55 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.57, 5 years: 0.54), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is KMT a good diversifier for GT?

To a limited degree. At 0.55 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.55 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gt-vs-kmt.json

GT vs KMT: 3-year weekly correlation 0.55GT vs KMT0.55

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![GT vs KMT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/gt-vs-kmt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gt-vs-kmt/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GT correlations · KMT correlations