PairBook
HomeGOLF › GOLF vs KMT

GOLF vs KMT: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF) and Kennametal Inc. (KMT) carry a correlation of 0.61, a strong link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.61
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.53
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.55
long-run
Ann. covariance
601.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GOLF and KMT?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of GOLF and KMT correlate at 0.61, strong. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.53 over 1 year against 0.61 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.55, with an annualized covariance of 601.7 %².

KMT is one of the assets that tracks GOLF most closely: it ranks #1 out of the 13 assets we track against GOLF. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months KMT outperformed by 33.2 percentage points (+10.1% for GOLF against +43.3% for KMT).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GOLF vs KMT: side by side

GOLF (Acushnet Holdings Corp.)KMT (Kennametal Inc.)
1-year return+10.1%+43.3%
5-year return+77.9%-6.6%
Volatility (ann.)29.1%33.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.770.73
Max drawdown (3Y)-28.3%-42.9%
Market cap$5.0B$2.3B
P/E (trailing)23.66.8
Dividend yield1.13%2.67%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: KMT 6.8 vs 23.6Higher yield: KMT 2.67% vs 1.13%Smaller drawdown: GOLF -28.3% vs -42.9%Higher 5y return: GOLF +77.9% vs -6.6%
-7%0%+86%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. GOLF · KMT

Year-by-year returns

YearGOLFKMT
2022-18.7%-31.0%
2023+51.0%+10.5%
2024+14.0%-3.9%
2025+13.7%+22.6%
2026+7.0%+8.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GOLF and KMT good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.61 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GOLF and KMT?

The GOLF/KMT correlation stands at 0.61 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.53, 5 years: 0.55), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is KMT a good diversifier for GOLF?

To a limited degree. At 0.61 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.61 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.61 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/golf-vs-kmt.json

GOLF vs KMT: 3-year weekly correlation 0.61GOLF vs KMT0.61

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![GOLF vs KMT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/golf-vs-kmt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/golf-vs-kmt/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GOLF correlations · KMT correlations