GPUS vs RGC: Correlation
Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS) and Regencell Bioscience Holdings Limited (RGC) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.49.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are GPUS and RGC?
Over the past 3 years, GPUS and RGC moved with a correlation of 0.49, which is moderate. The past 12 months show a weaker link (0.06) than the 3-year average (0.49). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.48, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 72822.4 %².
Few assets follow GPUS as closely as RGC, which ranks #3 of 10 tracked partners. The last year tells two different stories: GPUS led by 22.7 percentage points, -38.5% for GPUS against -61.2% for RGC.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
GPUS vs RGC: side by side
| GPUS (Hyperscale Data, Inc.) | RGC (Regencell Bioscience Holdings Limited) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -38.5% | -61.2% |
| 5-year return | -100.0% | +626.3% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 335.7% | 441.0% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.78 | -2.00 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -100.0% | -93.9% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 0.0 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | GPUS | RGC |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -89.9% | -12.4% |
| 2023 | -99.6% | -62.4% |
| 2024 | -93.7% | -53.0% |
| 2025 | -96.3% | +16053.8% |
| 2026 | +84.5% | -73.7% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are GPUS and RGC good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.49, GPUS and RGC keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between GPUS and RGC?
The GPUS/RGC correlation stands at 0.49 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.06, 5 years: 0.48), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is RGC a good diversifier for GPUS?
Reasonably. At 0.49, GPUS and RGC keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.49 mean?
A reading of 0.49 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gpus-vs-rgc.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gpus-vs-rgc/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: GPUS correlations · RGC correlations
